Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1057

reference
42-tree-1
name
1057
tree-preservation-order

undefined

42-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.960368 50.788168)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.960269 50.788158,-0.960274 50.788177,-0.960287 50.788195,-0.960309 50.788209,-0.960336 50.788218,-0.960367 50.788221,-0.960398 50.788219,-0.960426 50.788210,-0.960448 50.788196,-0.960462 50.788179,-0.960468 50.788159,-0.960463 50.788140,-0.960450 50.788122,-0.960428 50.788108,-0.960400 50.788099,-0.960370 50.788096,-0.960339 50.788098,-0.960311 50.788107,-0.960289 50.788121,-0.960274 50.788138,-0.960269 50.788158)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL